More than 1,000 Amazon.com Inc. employees have publicly challenged the company’s artificial intelligence (AI) strategy, raising concerns over its environmental impact, workforce displacement, and surveillance capabilities in an open letter to company CEO Andy Jassy and other executives.

The letter, which includes signatures from software engineers to Whole Foods cashiers, represents a small but vocal fraction of Amazon’s 1.53-million-person workforce who are alarmed by what they consider a dangerous race toward AI development that prioritizes speed over responsibility.

“We, the undersigned Amazon employees, have serious concerns about this aggressive rollout during the global rise of authoritarianism and our most important years to reverse the climate crisis,” the letter’s authors wrote. “We believe that the all-costs-justified, warp-speed approach to AI development will do staggering damage to democracy, to our jobs, and to the earth.”

Topping employees’ concerns is Amazon’s environmental track record. The company has publicly committed to achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2040, highlighting initiatives like electric delivery vehicles and reduced packaging. However, corporate data shows emissions increased 6% last year, driven largely by the company’s aggressive expansion of data centers to support AI infrastructure.

Those facilities consume vast amounts of electricity to power servers and require significant water resources for cooling systems. An Amazon spokesman defended the company’s environmental efforts, noting investments in more than 600 renewable energy projects globally and partnerships for advanced nuclear energy development.

Still, the disconnect between stated goals and current trajectories has left many employees questioning leadership priorities. Amazon plans to invest approximately $150 billion in data center construction over the next 15 years, with $89.9 billion already spent this year primarily on Amazon Web Services infrastructure.

The letter comes after Amazon announced plans in October to slash 14,000 jobs, or 4% of its corporate workforce. And the online retailer isn’t likely done: Reports suggest total cuts could reach 30,000 jobs, marking the company’s largest workforce reduction.

Beth Galetti, Amazon’s senior vice president overseeing human resources, characterized the changes as necessary to adapt to transformative technology. The company maintains AI represents the most significant innovation since the internet, enabling unprecedented speed in product development and service delivery.

But company employees describe mounting pressure to integrate AI tools into projects regardless of necessity, with reduced resources for professional development even as productivity expectations increase. The letter said the approach has resulted in inefficiency while eroding worker morale and career prospects.

The letter’s authors also warned of Amazon’s expanding surveillance capabilities. They specifically cite the company’s Ring doorbell camera division and its renewed cooperation with law enforcement agencies, which allows police to request footage from users’ devices.

Workers fear AI-enhanced surveillance tools could be weaponized by authoritarian governments or used for mass deportation efforts. The letter calls for explicit commitments that Amazon’s AI systems won’t support violence, surveillance, or human rights violations.

The employees are requesting a detailed public roadmap for powering all data centers with renewable energy, meaningful employee input in organizational AI deployment decisions, and binding pledges against using AI for harmful purposes.

Amazon’s November announcement of a $50 billion investment to expand AI infrastructure for government customers, beginning in 2026, has intensified concerns. Workers argue that without clear ethical boundaries and environmental accountability, the company’s AI ambitions could cause lasting damage to democratic institutions, employment stability, and planetary health.

The letter concludes with an appeal to leadership’s stated values, asking whether Amazon will build technology that enhances human flourishing or simply race ahead without regard for consequences. As AI development accelerates across the tech industry, Amazon’s response may signal how major corporations balance innovation with responsibility.