OpenAI is on trajectory to surpass $20 billion in annual revenue by the end of 2025, illustrating a surge in global demand for artificial intelligence (AI) services, CEO Sam Altman said.

But questions continue to mount on some basic math: How will it pay for more than $1.4 trillion on datacenters in the coming years in the wake of multibillion-dollar deals with Oracle Corp., NVIDIA Corp., Microsoft Corp., AMD Inc., Broadcom Inc., and Amazon.com Inc.?

Altman’s has boldly predicted OpenAI could generate “hundreds of billions” in revenue by 2030. “We plan to be a wildly successful company,” he said.

The milestone underscores sharp growth for the San Francisco-based company whose ChatGPT platform and enterprise AI offerings have gained widespread adoption across IT, financial services, healthcare, and education.

The revenue announcement also comes amid intensifying scrutiny over OpenAI’s relationship with government financing, particularly over its ambitious $1.4 trillion data center commitments. To fund heavy spending on AI infrastructure, companies increasingly are navigating a growing list of complex debt-financing options.

In recent media appearances, Altman moved to address what he characterized as misconceptions about federal support. He told Reuters that OpenAI has discussed government loan guarantees solely for chip manufacturing facilities — not data centers — emphasizing the company’s strategic focus on technological infrastructure while maintaining operational independence.

“We are not seeking government bailouts for our AI initiatives,” Altman told Bloomberg, underscoring OpenAI’s commitment to self-sufficiency despite its evolution from research organization to commercial powerhouse.

The discussion over government involvement intensified following remarks by Chief Financial Officer Sarah Friar at a Wall Street Journal event last week, where she suggested the U.S. government should “backstop” OpenAI’s infrastructure loans. Under such arrangements, taxpayers guarantee debt in the event of default, typically securing more favorable lending terms.

Friar explained that compute constraints currently force OpenAI to rely on older, more affordable chips, though the company aims to deploy cutting-edge models on the latest hardware. She proposed building an ecosystem of banks, private equity firms, and government support the strategy.

“The U.S. government has been incredibly forward-leaning, has really understood that AI is almost a national strategic asset,” Friar said. Such federal backing, she noted, could “really drop the cost of the financing” while expanding borrowing capacity.

But after the Journal published footage of Friar discussing a potential federal backstop, she issued a clarification on LinkedIn.

“I want to clarify my comments earlier today. OpenAI is not seeking a government backstop for our infrastructure commitments. I used the word ‘backstop’ and it muddied the point,” she wrote.

David Sacks, the Trump administration’s AI czar and veteran Silicon Valley venture capitalist, addressed the controversy Thursday on social media platform X, ruling out federal intervention for struggling AI companies.

“There will be no federal bailout for AI. The U.S. has at least 5 major frontier model companies. If one fails, others will take its place,” Sacks wrote, indicating the administration’s focus would instead be on streamlining “permitting and power generation.”