Meta Platforms Inc. CEO Mark Zuckerberg has mounted a sharp defense of open-access artificial intelligence (AI), warning against the centralized control of superintelligent technologies and criticizing industry rivals for promoting narratives “filled with doom.”

In an opinion piece published Tuesday in The Wall Street Journal, the tech mogul argued that the defining debate of the modern tech era is not whether superintelligence will emerge, but who will control it. Zuckerberg pushed back against restricting powerful AI models to a handful of elite tech firms or government institutions, advocating instead for a framework of “personal superintelligence” distributed directly to the public.

“The defining question of our age isn’t whether superintelligence will exist, but who will have access to it,” Zuckerberg wrote. “Will it be centralized and restricted to a few institutions, or will it be a tool that empowers everyone?”

Drawing explicit parallels to democratic values and market economics, Zuckerberg rejected the premise that a small group of experts or systems should decide what is best for society. History demonstrates that concentrating absolute power rarely yields safe or positive outcomes, he argued, whereas individual choice and free enterprise consistently drive broader prosperity.

The Meta chief took thinly veiled jabs at leading AI rivals, including Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, both of whom have frequently voiced concerns regarding potential job losses and catastrophic societal risks tied to rapid AI advances.

“It is surprising that the discourse from many of those who are developing artificial intelligence is so filled with doom,” Zuckerberg wrote. “I don’t understand why anyone who believes that AI will eliminate most jobs and much of humanity’s relevance would rush to build that future.”

Addressing economic anxiety, Zuckerberg countered that widespread access to superintelligence will expand the global labor market rather than shrink it. By lowering barriers to entrepreneurship and serving as an intellectual force multiplier — providing individuals with capabilities akin to having a superintelligent lawyer or research partner — he predicted a surge in new businesses, scientific discoveries, and net job growth.

The executive’s push for decentralized, open-weight AI models comes at a pivotal juncture for the American technology sector. U.S. developers face mounting pressure from competitive open-source releases out of China, such as Moonshot AI’s Kimi K3, raising concerns that American developers could default to foreign open-source alternatives if domestic technology remains locked behind proprietary walls.

To head off stringent regulatory action, Meta recently joined forces with tech peers including NVIDIA Corp. and OpenAI to urge the White House against over-regulating open-weight models. Microsoft Corp. CEO Satya Nadella and Alexandr Wang of Scale AI praised Zuckerberg’s broader message of individual empowerment.

While championing broad distribution, Zuckerberg acknowledged critical safety concerns, particularly regarding national security and biological threats, which he noted will require coordinated governance between federal institutions and tech developers. However, he argued that risks such as cybersecurity are best defended by widely available, open-source software that allows the broader developer community to identify and patch vulnerabilities.

Zuckerberg’s optimistic outlook arrives amid lingering public skepticism. Recent polling from the Pew Research Center shows that a majority of American adults feel more concerned than excited about the growing prevalence of AI in daily life, while local communities increasingly protest the rapid expansion of energy-intensive data centers required to train advanced models.

Despite these headwinds, Zuckerberg reaffirmed Meta’s commitment to open AI development, framing the technology as the most consequential breakthrough of the coming decades.